Seven Reasons Why the Prophetic Solar Year
is Set to the Day of Y2K(In summary)
|
|
Definitions:
|
The question:
Only one day since Creation perfectly agrees astronomically with what is the (average) prophetic solar year. This one day was Jan. 1st, AD 2000.1
As you might recall, Jan. 1st, AD 2000 was "Y2K-day." It was the day when the computer clocks around the world (unless corrected) went into a loop of time so that the year 2000 read incorrectly as AD 1900. Unless corrected, this will repeat itself every 100 years forever---never getting past the year 1999. "Y2K" cost billions of dollars to fix. Though no catastrophe occurred as predicted by many (not myself), nevertheless, the event served as a important sign. (We explain shortly).
When we say that there has only ever been one day that has astronomically agreed with the prophetic solar year, what we mean is this: According to scientists, the average speed of the earth on Y2K in its orbit around the sun (if constant at that speed forever) would take 365.2421896698 days to complete. (This is called, an average tropical solar year). Now it happens that this precise measurement of a solar year generates a calendar whose numeric patterns are identical with those repeatedly spoken of in the bible. Furthermore, these patterns emerge not only from this precise measurement of a solar year, but also from the measurement of the synodic month (at Y2K)---pegged at 29.5305888531 days! The odds of all this happening by random chance are nil.
This is the prophetic calendar of which we are examining, and the question before us is: How is it that only the day of Y2K has the exact average orbiting speed of the earth around the sun whereby the resulting solar year (if made constant) would produce all the numerous numeric patterns in the bible?
The Answer:
First in summary (and then in detail):
(Answered in increasing order of importance and complexity); Y2K is
the logical day to reveal the length of a prophetic solar year because:
Y2K (Jan. 1, 2000) was 5760 years from the Jewish traditional date (used in their own calendar) for the creation of the world. It happens that 5760 years is:
144 generations of 40 years,
or, 480 x 12,
or, 360 x 16.
And it is also 6 generations of 40 years short of 6000 years.
Each of the above combination of numbers are important to the 360 calendar. This is no small proof that the year of Y2K is that year (and day) chosen by God to reveal the full details of the 360 calendar, since the 360 calendar (as based on the solar year set to Y2K) is in perfect harmony with the number of years from the creation to Y2K.
***(The full
detailed article on this 6th point is worth reading. It also explains the
symbolism behind the numbers used in the 360 calendar, and in '5760 years.')***
Endnotes:
1. The prophetic calendar presupposes a fixed solar year of 365.242 189 669 8 days, which happened to have occurred on Y2K. In reality however, the length of a solar year is steadily decreasing---though ever so slightly. Nevertheless, over millions and billions of years even a very slight but steady decrease affects accuracy. Any day since the Creation would be close enough to the Y2K figure to be accurate up until the level of the 4000-year cycles; however, beyond this, only Y2K holds the secret to the cycles that occur thereafter.
It is most interesting that scientists estimate that the solar year around 4000 BC (approximately Creation) was 365.24250 days. This is precisely the solar year required for the 4000-year cycles to continue forever with no further need of correction! And furthermore, it also means that the first cycle would have concluded at the birth of Christ; moreover, Y2K is half way through the next 4000-year cycle!
Astronomers set this figure for Y2K to the tenth decimal point. This is as accurate as any one day can be since every day also decreases on average at the same tiny rate of one-to-the-tenth decimal point, (i.e., .000 000 000 1, or more precisely, 1.4e-10 days). Doubtless, the astronomers themselves do not claim this figure on Y2K to be anything more than a workable approximate. Nevertheless, just as the computer-related events of "Y2K" are a sovereign sign, so likewise is this measurement---even if later it is revaluated to some other figure. If ever it is revaluated, (and unanimity among astronomers reached), it would be interesting to know what day the 365.242 189 669 8 figure would then land on! Perhaps it might turn out to be some time in AD 1995 and thereby pinpoint for the world the actual and literal birth date of Christ exactly 2,000 years earlier?!!? Whatever happens, one thing remains sure---365.2421896698 on Y2K, (accurately or accidentally), is a most remarkable sign---perhaps the most remarkable since the star of Bethlehem some 2,000 years earlier! (See also "average" solar year.)
Why Y2K?
Summarized
In detail...***Reason Number Six & Seven*** (imp. reading!)
|